Nat Hager wrote: > It's a convenient formalism used in rotational mechanics. For those of us who are not practitioners of rotational mechanics, it's a somewhat inconvenient formalism, as it violates the usual mathematical definition of vector. However, thanks for adding to my relatively limited knowledge of that field. <g> Bill Potts, CMS San Jose, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
- [USMA:10196] Re: South Africa Joseph B. Reid
- [USMA:10202] Re: South Africa Bill Potts
- [USMA:10204] Re: South Africa Nat Hager III
- [USMA:10212] Re: Torque & Re: Re: Sout... Bill Potts
- [USMA:10212] Re: Torque & Re: Re: ... James R. Frysinger
- [USMA:10215] RE: The Axis Powers Bill Potts
- [USMA:10216] RE: The Axis Pow... Nat Hager III
- [USMA:10289] RE: The Axis... Gene Mechtly
- [USMA:10213] Re: South Africa Nat Hager III
- [USMA:10214] Re: South Africa James R. Frysinger
- [USMA:10207] Torque Gene Mechtly
- [USMA:10208] RE: Torque Bill Potts
