From: Joseph B. Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: February 27, 2001 16:55

>John Tauxe wrote in USMA 11327:
>
>>Well, my note about not being able to measure mass generated some
>>discussion, alsmost all of it identifying the balance as a way of
measuring
>>mass.  I still disagree.
>>
>>At 13:11 2001-02-27 -0600, Gene Mechtly wrote:
>>>On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, John Tauxe wrote:
>
>>Show me a device that can measure mass under zero gravity and I'll admit
>>that mass can be measured.
>>
>>- John
>>
>>_____________________________________________________________
>>John Tauxe, PhD, PE                voice: 505.662.0707 ext 15
>>Neptune and Company                         fax: 505.662.0500
>>1505 15th St.  Suite B         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Los Alamos, NM  87544-3063                 LANL mailstop M969
>>___________ http://www.neptuneandco.com/~jtauxe _____________
>
>
>Our standard of mass is the master Kilogram, which is preserved with all
>precautions.  It was constructed to have the mass of one decimetre cubed
>atwater at 4°C.  All other kilogram standards have been prepared by
>comparison with the master (or prototype) Kilogram.  The comparison could
>theoretically be made anywhere: at sea level, on Mount Everest, on the
>moon.  You are right that the weights of the two standards are being
>compared, but if the weights on the balance are equal, then the masses are
>equal, even though the ratio between mass and weight depends on the local
>acceleration due to gravity.  The mass of an object is constant, the weight
>varies with location.
>
>Under zero gravity the only test of mass would be the measurement of the
>acceleration produced by a standard force, a most difficult procedure.  It
>also raises the problem of standardizing the force.
>
>I think you suffer from the engineering tradition of considering the
>pound-force as a basic unit.

a la Donald Shead!
Duncan

An engineer wrote to the Globe and Mail that
>in going metric Canada was changing from using a system based on weight to
>one based on mass.  He admitted that he would expect to get more butter in
>a pound in Denver than he would in Toronto, although the difference would
>be negible.
>
>Joseph B. Reid
>17 Glebe Road West
>Toronto    M5P 1C8                       Tel. 416 486-6071
>

Reply via email to