OK gang,  I've incorporated your comments along with mine to the Discovery
Channel.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Hu, Alfred  
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 9:34 AM
> To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:      would you please be more flexible and get with the rest of
> the world
> 
> Hello Discovery Channel,
> 
> We are frequent viewers of the Discovery Channel since it is entertaining
> and very informative.  However  we notice a few shortcomings in your
> programming among which is the lack of use of the metric system.  As you
> may know the rest of the world is on the metric system and many schools
> are teaching it to students.  It is time to wean the public from using
> archaic inches and feet and promote  further use of metric units.
> Furthermore many Americans are already familiar with metric sized
> beverages, films, Olympic events, and ski trails.  Here are few comments
> we've gotten from some of the viewers:
>    
> 
> "Last night, my wife and I watched part of Discovery Channel's show on 
> the Mammoth "exhumation" in Siberia. We saw the same thing. Tusks got 
> measured in meters and centimeters, and so forth. Yet the narrator's 
> script included not one SI unit with the possible exception of the 
> second.
> 
> My wife asked about that and I told her that it seemed to me as if 
> Discovery had an explicit and striclty adhered to policy of avoiding 
> metric units. My comments to Discovery Channel in the past were brushed 
> off."
> 
> 
> 
> " Anyone notice that the scientists uses metric but the narrator
>  continues to use the ancient units of measure.
> 
>  What is it with the discovery channel that it insists on converting
>  to the old system.  Why do they continue to insult us all with this?"
> 
> 
> We all agree that it is truly disturbing to have the narrator translate
> metric units back to US Customary needlessly in many programs.  The excuse
> that the majority of the audience is in the US so using metric units
> should be discouraged is no longer valid.  Please start being more
> flexible
> in your programming.
> 
> Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
> 
> Alfred et al    -   San Francisco, CA
> 

Reply via email to