At 14:04 4/19/01 -0600, you wrote:

>But I didn't say "explicit," Karl; I said "emphatic." There's a world of
>difference.
>
>Their reply shows that they didn't pay much attention to Nick's reference to
>metric packaging. It seems to have gone completely over the head of the
>person who wrote the response.
>
>Moreover, Nick agrees with that assessment.

Well, I disagree with you and Nick. He could have been more emphatic -- and 
then he would have sounded like a kook. That doesn't help the cause. One 
has to assume that the person on the other end has half a brain, and the 
point was made strongly enough for that assumption. The reply may not have 
been, "Thanks, I'm glad you like our bag," but the respondant got the point 
that the product, which includes the package, is appreciated.

Reply via email to