2001-04-28

I received this e-mail today and am forwarding it to the list.  SOME of you
might want to scour this site's news letters for information related to
metric, and/or even subscribe to their newsletters, or even contribute some
of your own comments.

Below, is an excerpt from the ENGINEERS FORUM.  As you see, there is a
comment in the second paragraph against European bias towards metric only.
But, without that bias, the US would certainly force everyone to use FFU.

I just wonder what "system" this guy wants US standards to be in that would
counter pressure CE.

Is the metric - FFU battle finally to develop into a heated battle in the
next 10 years or so?  It will for sure be interesting to see.



STANDARDS ARE DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW

Having to comply with CE requirements on many products has been a real
challenge. We have been forced to improve and re-design many products to be
compliant. It has been very beneficial and worth every effort required.

I have problems with the bias towards metric only, and components that don't
have approvals in Europe and North America. I have a problem with requiring
manufactures with non-CE member facilities (us) to use third party testing
on everything and being 100% compliant while locals self certify based on
there understanding of the standards.

I would like to see some US standards formed that would counter pressure CE
and eventually force a common world-wide standard to be developed.

David Kerzel Chief Engineer






John

Keiner ist hoffnungsloser versklavt als derjenige, der irrt�mlich glaubt
frei zu sein.

There are none more hopelessly enslaved then those who falsely believe they
are free!

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)


----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 2001-04-28 08:12
Subject: Global Engineering Journal 3


> Dear Manufacturing Engineer,
>
>
> Greetings!
>
> TechSavvy Journal is now Global Engineering Journal, which better
identifies the source - Global Engineering Documents.
>
> NOTE: Click on a link below to continue your subscription of this
newsletter.  Non-participating readers may be deleted after the next issue.
>
> In this issue, we spotlight selected comments from engineers and others
who use standards every day.
>
> Table of Contents
>
>   + Standards Become Standards When Gorillas Comply
>   + Controversies and Comments About Standards
>   + Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation
>      - The Case for Standards
>   + Not Sure Which Standards You Need?
>      - Let Global do the research for you
>   + Get Industry-specific Standards News
>
> Please send more comments.
>
> Sincerely,
> Mr. Jaren Green, Sr. Editor
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Global Engineering Documents
> http://news.ihs.com/GoNow/a14065a34043a59197769a6
> A Division of IHS Engineering
>
> =======================================================
>      GLOBAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL  -- Issue No. 3
> =======================================================
>
>
> HEADLINE: Standards Become Standards When Gorillas Comply
>
> As a high-tech marketing pro, Don Chambers knows the value (and the cost)
of following standards. His comments to the Global Engineering Journal were
blunt: "Documents require a '900-pound gorilla' to become standards.
Specifications that are written and either not implemented or ignored are
not standards, no matter what the title."
>
> FULL STORY: http://news.ihs.com/GoNow/a14065a34043a59197769a2
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
> ENGINEERS' FORUM
> HEADLINE: Controversies and Comments About Standards
>
> The January issue sparked a number of critical responses. When we asked
readers to charcterize a "good" standard, some legitimate concerns surfaced.
>
> FULL STORY: http://news.ihs.com/GoNow/a14065a34043a59197769a3
>
>    _______________________________________________
>   |
>   |  SAVE 20% on the 2001 QPL and SOS editions
>   |
>   |  The most current source for qualified military
>   |  products - the Qualified Product List and Sources
>   |  (QPL), and the most comprehensive source for
>   |  military supplier listings - the Source of Supply
>   |  (SOS), are now available for 2001.
>   |  Both are terrific resources for locating military
>   |  products which require qualification by test and
>   |  related sources of supply for hardware products.
>   |
>   |  Order the 2001 Editions of the QPL and SOS and
>   |  save 20% when you order both together.
>   |
>   |  QPL 2001: http://news.ihs.com/GoNow/a14065a34043a59197769a0
>   |  SOS: http://news.ihs.com/GoNow/a14065a34043a59197769a1
>   |
>   |  CALL: 1-800-854-7179
>   |_______________________________________________
>
>
> HEADLINE: Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation
>             - The Case for Standards
>
> By Ken Krechmer
> Technical Editor for the Communications Standards Review
>
> "An initial decision in the Microsoft anti-trust litigation was reached
April 3, 2000. The legal decision is to split the company into two parts,
not dissimilar to the way the AT&T monopoly was broken up in 1984. However,
such action may not be necessary or desirable to control this monopoly.
Microsoft maintains their very successful operating system monopoly through
the use of proprietary specifications as well as aggressive marketing. Open
standards offer an alternative means to allow market forces to redress any
Microsoft abuses. The use of proprietary specifications were developed in
the 20th century to maintain monopolies. Now open standards may be used to
maintain both competition and competitive advantage, which minimizes the
potential for monopoly abuse."
>
> FULL PAPER: http://news.ihs.com/GoNow/a14065a34043a59197769a4
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
> HEADLINE: Not Sure Which Standards You Need?
>            - Let Global do the Research for You
>
> Keeping up with all the standards that relate to your product or work is
nearly impossible.  If you don't have time to research all the new and
updated documents, our Technical Search Department can help.  They know what
is new and how to get it.
>
> Example: Medical Devices and EMC Warning Letter - Increased incidents of
EMC interference with medical devices have caused the FCC to establish
dedicated frequencies for these devices. Incidents have ranged from
wheelchairs moving on their own to a defibrillator that "flatlined and went
into defibrillation mode spontaneously," to a pacemaker that caused
"excruciating pain" in a patience when it misfired during EMT transmissions.
>
> The FDA has recently reissued an earlier letter discussing EMC issues as
they affect medical devices. Copies of this warning letter and other
critical documents are available from Global's Technical Search Department.
>
> For more information, contact Kathleen Sullivan.
> CALL: 1-800-624-3974 (ext. 7967) or 303-397-7967
> SITE: http://news.ihs.com/GoNow/a14065a34043a59197769a6
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
> HEADLINE: Get Industry-specific Standards News
>
> In additon to this Journal, Global Engineering Documents also offers 5
FREE newsletters: Automotive, Aviation and Aerospace, Electro,
Government/Military, and Telecom.  Learn about updated and revised
standards, new resources, and other industry specific news.
>
> To subscribe or for more info, visit
http://news.ihs.com/GoNow/a14065a34043a59197769a5
>
>
> ========================================================
> Copyright 2001, Global Engineering Documents,
> A Division of IHS Engineering
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Click below to unsubscribe from future IHS mailings:
>
> http://news.ihs.com/Change-Remove/a14065a59197769a2
>
>

Reply via email to