I think that it would be fine for other people to write. But, as you
suggest, I would hope that they do NOT cite my letter or imitate it too
closely. I'm certain that I have not cornered the world market on
intelligent insights (nor in fact may not have many samples close at
hand) and that members of this list might well have some other points
that they wish to make.
I do hope, though, that anyone who writes does so with the thought in
mind that Kilpatrick was poking fun at his own profession. It was a
confession, not a creed. Please encourage him and do not berate him. Be
gentle, my colleagues! Who knows, perhaps he'll take up my suggestion
and comment on the misuse, abuse, and disuse of metric units in
journalism. He would make a fine ally.
Jim
Gene Mechtly wrote:
>
> A brilliant letter, Jim! We eagerly await news of response(s), and
> eventual correction of this problem with journalists who are poorly
> qualified to write on topics related to science and technology, and
> to understand and use SI without fear. A local journalist admitted
> to me last week that 'e was afraid of science and math and took *no*
> significant courses in these fields during college journalism school.
>
> Let us know if and when we may "chime in" (mention your letter).
>
> After I read Kilpatrick's column, I might give him my evaluation
> (essentially the same as yours) immediately (*without* mention of
> your letter). It might be more effective with no obvious connection,
> as you have preferred on several previous occasions.
>
> Gene.
> ........................
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, James R. Frysinger wrote:
>
> > I have just posted the following email to James J. Kilpatrick, with
> > information copies to the AP Wire ("feedback") and the editor of our
> > local newspaper.
> > ...
--
Metric Methods(SM) "Don't be late to metricate!"
James R. Frysinger, CAMS http://www.metricmethods.com/
10 Captiva Row e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charleston, SC 29407 phone/FAX: 843.225.6789
