On Sat, 15 Sep 2001 10:38:15  
 Joseph B. Reid wrote:
>Ma Be in USMA 15263 mused:
>
>>Dear folks...
>>
>>I honestly believe that it's too early to draw any definitive conclusions
>>about who may have been behind such atrocity.  I guess everyone remembers
>>what happened at Oklahoma too well.  At the time there was also a lot of
>>"blame laying" and on the same guy, Osama Bin Laden, who is  also been
>>suspected this time.  Well...  It turned out that it wasn't.  Now the same
>>thing is happening again...  So...  Please take a look at what ****I received
>>by e-mail**** from *American sources* this morning.  ****This**** should give all 
>some
>>****food for thought****...  (In essence, ****one**** could honestly pose the 
>question,
>>****could**** this be some hideous plot by CIA and "affiliates" to justify a
>>warlike effort by the US while simultaneously dragging the rest of the
>>world in it?  Could it be that they've tried it earlier - Oklahoma - but
>>planned it better this time?...  Only God knows...).
>>
>>Marcus

I'm sorry, Bill Hooper, but I need to write this reply to Mr. Joe Reid, as this 
gentleman is *publicly* completely misrepresenting what I posted to this group.  
However, I promise you that I will not post any more messages on this subject unless I 
feel that my reputation and/or position is being tarnished. 

>Ma Be apparently believes that the CIA could recruit 19 men prepared to
>commit mass suicide.
>
Mr. Reid, I call your attention to the pairs of '****' above coming straight from my 
"mouth".  Even though you used the word "apparently" in your statement above your 
conclusion about what I wrote totally misrepresents my intentions.  I sincerely hope 
you be much more careful in the future about drawing conclusions of this nature about 
what I write, sir.  I certainly have NOT made up my mind about what's happened in this 
case as far as who may have been behind it.  I believe I made that CRYSTAL CLEAR in my 
message!  So, please don't put words in my mouth I didn't say.  That is quite 
inappropriate, to say the least.  Thank you.

>A construction engineer friend pointed to me that the eircraft selected by
>the highjackers took off on long distance flights and were steered into
>their targets at the beginning of their flights, and hence carried tons of
>fuel.  It was that fuel that fed the fires that weakened the structural
>steel of the World Trade Centers.  Further, the towers were hit low enough
>so the weight of the towers above the hits was enough to cause the crashes
>that brought the towers down.  If the airplanes had hit the top storeys
>only the towerss might not have collapsed.
>...
Your point above and Bill Pott's (on an earlier post) certainly have merit.  I just 
hope that whoever is responsible to conduct the investigation on this tragedy will 
consider all the arguments on the subject and draw conclusions that could withstand 
any thorough scrutiny.  Both the world and the American people deserve to know the 
TRUTH about this and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH (if that is remotely possible)!!!

Marcus


Get 250 color business cards for FREE!
http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/

Reply via email to