Whether it's 5,000 hp or 3,3730 kW, we are talking about its rated output.  Efficiencies, design margins etc. are completely separate issues.
Duncan
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: October 20, 2001 23:15
Subject: [USMA:15766] Re: IEEE per 2001-10

In a message dated 2001-10-20 11:11:46 Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


The resistance among mechanical engineers to drop the horsepower most likely
has a lot to do with the magnitude of numbers.  A 5000 HP motor, depending
on how much over design there is in it, can be "rated" in kilowatts anywhere
from 3 750 to 4 000 kW.  In these cases, the numbers can be rescaled to 3.75
and 4 MW.

The instinct of a typical mechanical engineer is to just convert the numbers
with a calculator and let the power in watts come out where it does.  But,
you are stuck with a "funny numbers" that twist the tongue.  Also, powers in
watts tend to be numerically less than their equivalent in horsepowers, thus
the motor doesn't seem to be as impressive.  Mechanical engineers like big
numbers.   It somehow must make up for something else that is lacking.  As
for the power efficiency, the mechanical engineer doesn't care.  He turns
that over to the electrical engineer to convert the hp's to watts and see
how much electrical power is required.  As long as the motor does its job,
they don't care.


And then you get the idiotic claims on certain household products where, for example, a shop vacuum says "6.0 peak HP" which would equate to about 4.5 kilowatts which, in turn, would imply its own dedicated 30 amp, 240 volt circuit!  Actual wattage on the one I have (and the one that makes this claim) is about 900 watts which would be about 1.2 HP.  (The above assumes no losses in conversion of electricity to mechanical motion, which of course isn't the case.)

Carleton

Reply via email to