On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (after EAM had written: SI is best for all engineering and technology, including aerospace engineering. Only traditional practices and vested economic interests impede the universal adoption of SI.) > > Well said, Gene. I find it hard to see how anyone could cogently argue > the contrary thesis.
Thanks for the compliment, Ezra. > I just wish the winds of change would blow harder > in the direction of aerospace engineering! > ... My wish also. Perhaps the new administrator of NASA can be persuaded to promote SI more vigorously in spite of congressional complaints of NASA,s spending beyond budgets on the Space Station. Gene.
