2001-12-11

Now, Now girls!  NO FIGHTING!

John







----- Original Message -----
From: "Wizard of OS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2001-12-11 18:18
Subject: [USMA:16604] RE: Metric in the news


> you are talking nonsense!
>
> I can get the units dic from the library and prove it!
>
> dont mess with me! :D
>
>
> >From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: [USMA:16601] RE: Metric in the news
> >Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:54:28 -0800
> >
> >Nonsense. The German for square kilometer is Quadratkilometer.
> >
> >"n Kilometer Quadrat" has the same meaning as the English "n-kilometer
> >square." The "square" part of the expression is neither a unit of measure
> >nor a component of a unit of measure. It is simply descriptive. The unit
> >"kilometer" is used in defining the length of a side of that square.
Thus,
> >a
> >four kilometer square (or vier Kilometer Quadrat) has an area of 16
square
> >kilometers (16 Quadratkilometer).
> >
> >Note that, absent a value (stated or implied), both kilometer square and
> >Kilometer Quadrat are meaningless (neither being a unit).
> >
> >Bill Potts, CMS
> >Roseville, CA
> >http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> >Behalf Of Wizard of OS
> >Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 06:15
> >To: U.S. Metric Association
> >Subject: [USMA:16592] RE: Metric in the news
> >
> >
> >bill I guess there is a misunderstanding
> >
> >i.e. in german the therm for km� is Kilometerquadrat, which is valid for
> >more than 20 years now.
> >
> >a four kilometer square is 4 km� I presume
> >
> >deriving from the that the therm square kilometer is wrong at all, I have
> >never seen �km!!!
> >
> >
> > >From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: [USMA:16590] RE: Metric in the news
> > >Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:49:20 -0800
> > >
> > >Interestingly, on CNN, Christiane Amanpour was describing the area
being
> > >bombed as a four kilometer square. The news readers were referring to
the
> > >same area as one and a half square miles -- an unnecessary and
completely
> > >incorrect conversion.
> > >
> > >A four kilometer square is 16 square kilometers, or approximately 6
> >square
> > >miles.
> > >
> > >Bill Potts, CMS
> > >Roseville, CA
> > >http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > >Behalf Of kilopascal
> > >Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 15:55
> > >To: U.S. Metric Association
> > >Subject: [USMA:16585] Metric in the news
> > >
> > >
> > >2001-12-10
> > >
> > >This Morning on the NBC today show, a soldier from the Afghan conflict
> >was
> > >interviewed.  He was one of the soldiers injured in the friendly fire
> > >attack
> > >that killed 3 of his comrades.
> > >
> > >Twice he gave distances and both times they were in kilometres
> > >(kill-lom-eters).  Not once did he say an FFU term.  Also, on the
evening
> > >news on NBC, the reporter in Afghanistan near Tora Bora also reported
> >using
> > >"hundreds of metres" when describing bin Laden's possible hiding place.
> > >
> > >Also he stated that the deaths were the results of wrong co-ordinates
> > >radioed to the plane overhead as to where to drop the bomb.  I wonder
if
> > >someone made a metric/English conversion error.  Will we ever know, or
> >will
> > >it be hushed up?  Can you see the headlines:
> > >
> > >"AMERICAN SOLDIERS DIE IN VAIN BECAUSE OF ENGLISH/METRIC SYSTEM
MISTAKE".
> > >Enough of these headlines might get the ball rolling.
> > >
> > >John
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Downloaden Sie MSN Explorer kostenlos unter
http://explorer.msn.de/intl.asp
> >
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Werden Sie Mitglied bei MSN Hotmail, dem gr��ten E-Mail-Service der Welt.
> http://www.hotmail.com/de
>

Reply via email to