always observe the diffenrence between:

4 km square and (4 km) square
4 km^2      and  (4 km)^2 = 16 km^2

>From: "kilopascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [USMA:16603] RE: Metric in the news
>Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:19:39 -0500
>
>2001-12-11
>
>That is a good point.  When Christiane said a "four kilometre square", did 
>she mean a 4 x 4 km plot of land or did she mean a total area of 4 km�?  
>Did she know what she meant or did she just read off of a prompter someone 
>else's words?  We really can't be sure.
>
>As for Bill's comment about the farmers and acres, I doubt they could do it 
>either. They may know the sizes of certain parcels of land, not because 
>they can measure it or guess it, but because they were told that by someone 
>else.  Anyway, nobody is going to bother to check for accuracy.
>
>John
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joseph B. Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, 2001-12-11 14:10
>Subject: [USMA:16599] RE: Metric in the news
>
>
> > Bill Hooper wrote in USMA 16596:
> >
> > >on 12/11/2001 6:49 AM, Bill Potts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > >> Interestingly, on CNN, Christiane Amanpour was describing the area 
>being
> > >> bombed as a four kilometer square. The news readers were referring to
> > >>the same
> > >> area as one and a half square miles -- an unnecessary and completely
> > >>incorrect
> > >> conversion.
> > >>
> > >> A four kilometer square is 16 square kilometers, or approximately 6 
>square
> > >> miles.
> > >>
> > >> Bill Potts, CMS
> > >
> > >Unfortunately, a lot of people think that, because a square shape one
> > >kilometre long and one kilometres wide has an area of one square 
>kilometre,
> > >then a square four kilometres long and four kilometres wide must be 
>FOUR
> > >square kilometres.
> > >
> > >That's WRONG, of course (4 km by 4 km is 16 square kilometres as Potts
> > >noted), but not everyone knows that. Somewhere we fail to teach our 
>children
> > >in school what the concept of area is all about (and how it is 
>calculated).
> > >A related problem is the assumption that, if there are 0.6 MILES in one
> > >kilometre, there will be 0.6 SQUARE miles in one SQUARE kilometre.
> > >
> > >I suspect that most Americans don't understand these things well. But
> > >"that's all right" (sarcastic), they couldn't tell the difference 
>between
> > >CNN's 1.5 square miles and the correct 6 square miles anyway. How many
> > >people do you think could look out over a large area of land and give 
>you an
> > >accurate estimate of it's area in square anythings? (Perhaps some 
>farmers
> > >could do it, but thay'd do it in acres.)
> >
> > >Bill Hooper
> >
> >
> > I suspect that the area of devastation caused by the big bomb was 4 
>square
> > kilometres and the an ignorant scribe thought that was the same as a 4
> > kilometre square.  In which case, by another error by another scribe, 
>the
> > correct result of 1.5 square miles was produced.
> >
> > Joseph B.Reid
> > 17 Glebe Road West
> > Toronto  M5P 1C8             TEL. 416-486-6071
> >


s

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Fotos ist der einfachste Weg, Ihre Fotos auszudrucken und anderen 
Benutzern zur Verf�gung zu stellen: 
http://photos.msn.de/support/worldwide.aspx

Reply via email to