1,8 m under is better, more correct :D
Given the non-accuracy of six feet under, 2 meters under is probably just as good.
In a message dated 2002-01-21 15:33:51 Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given the non-accuracy of six feet under, 2 meters under is probably just as good.
Given the non-accuracy of six feet under, 2 meters under is probably just as good.
