[USMA:17533] Re: metrication penetration

[Duncan Bath]

And, snappier! D. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: January 21, 2002 18:10 Subject: [USMA:17531] Re: metrication penetration In a message dated 2002-01-21 15:33:51 Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1,8 m under is better, more correct :D Given the non-accuracy of six feet under, 2 meters under is probably just as good.