Han Maenen's USMA 17974 surprises me.  It reminds me of Napoleon's
"customary metric system" of 1812 which divided the metre in binary
fractions.

>Even if the kyu or Q is a non-decimal part of the mm, it will replace lots
>and lots of ridiculous jetsam and flotsam. The 0.25 mm is still an
>acceptable decimal fraction. We should NOT built a system of  typographical
>units on the Q; for everything else the millimeter should be enough.
>I am 100% in favour af adopting the Q or kyu, the sooner the better and I am
>also convinced that those who conceived it wanted to get rid of old and US
>printing units. Having a millimeter divided by 4 is a very small price to
>pay for a vast improvement. If they had gone to 1/8 then I would have said
>no as well.
>If the Q is ifp thinking, then the A-paper sizes are in fact the same as
>they are a binary series.


What decimal series of paper sizes would Han propose?

I agree with Ma Be's message in USMA 17953:

>Carter, Baron wrote:
>kyu: a metric unit of distance used in typography and graphic design. The
>kyu,
>originally written Q, is equal to exactly 0.25 millimeter...
>
>The thing that baffles me the most about this is why in the world didn't
>they go with the millimeter (or maybe even the micrometer)???  "Ifp"
>thinking at work here?  Good grief...  :-(


Joseph B.Reid
17 Glebe Road West
Toronto  M5P 1C8             TEL. 416-486-6071

Reply via email to