Don't worry, Steve.  The important thing is that noone has come up with a binary 
fraction converter yet.  *That* is a relief...  On the other hand I still don't like 
seeing decimalizations of ifp units.  To me that poses as a bigger threat to the 
acceptance of SI in the US than many other things, especially considering that the 
rest of the world could probably "accept/tolerate" them more than if they came in the 
usual crappy fractional way...

Marcus

On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:41:43  
 Stephen Davis wrote:
>As you have said, Marcus, I have probably misunderstood you!!
>
>I thought you were referring to fractions like 1/2, which, obviously, would convert 
>to 0.5 decimally!!
>
>That is why I said if I keyed in a fraction such as 11/20, the conversion would be 
>0.55!!
>
>Please forgive my obvious ignorance!!
>
>Regards,
>
>Steve.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Ma Be" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 7:19 PM
>Subject: [USMA:18143] Re: Weather reports during the Olympics
>
>
>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:35:50  
>>  Stephen Davis wrote:
>> >I see your point, Marcus, but surely a TV company (they certainly don't do so over 
>here, to my knowledge) would not bother converting metric to binary fractions 
>anyway!!  
>> >
>> Perhaps not.  However, "the man on the street in the US" is much more familiar with 
>binary fractions than some 2.55-in value!  BTW, it worries me quite a bit that we 
>seem to be seeing more and more decimal inches and feet out there!  Evidently this is 
>the sort of thing I have been witnessing in the aerospace industry, but never thought 
>it would become so prevalent elsewhere.
>> 
>> I just wished Americans complained more about this bastardization of their own 
>system.  Oh, well...  Wishful thinking, I guess...  :-S
>> 
>> >Surely the decimal equivalent would suffice??
>> >
>> Please, see above.
>> 
>> >Incidentally, unless I have missed your point by a couple of km, 0.55mm converted 
>to a binary fraction would be 11/20, wouldn't it??
>> >
>> Yes, I'm afraid you did miss my point.  I was always talking about *binary* 
>fractions (2^-n), 11/20 would not qualify for that.
>> 
>> >Also, I happen to own a Casio fx-83WA scientific calculator that converts decimals 
>to binary fractions and back again, so it obviously can be done!! :)
>> >
>> ?  Are you saying that if you keyed in 0.55 in your calculator it would give the 
>conversion to 9/16?  Or would it be 35/64?...  On what basis would this conversion 
>be, what level of accuracy?  How can it tell when to convert it to a 16th, a 32nd, a 
>64th, etc?  Just curious...
>> 
>> Marcus
>> 
>> 
>> Is your boss reading your email? ....Probably
>> Keep your messages private by using Lycos Mail.
>> Sign up today at http://mail.lycos.com
>> 
>


Is your boss reading your email? ....Probably
Keep your messages private by using Lycos Mail.
Sign up today at http://mail.lycos.com

Reply via email to