http://www.footrule.org

It contains the eternal lie that they were convicted for selling loose goods in 
Imperial units, instead of having illegal scales. And there are many more 
inaccuracies and distortions, eg. they 'forget to mention the metrication 
decision mande in May 1965 when Britian was not yet a member of the EU. But 
that is what we can expect from the BWMA anyway. 


PRESS RELEASE 12 FEBRUARY 2002

IMPERIAL CLIMAX
The background to the coming verdict on the Metric Martyrs' appeal.

On Monday 18 February 2002 at 9:00am in the Royal Courts of Justice, Lord 
Justice Laws sitting with Mr. Justice Crane will give their judgment on the 
appeal by the five Metric Martyrs against their criminal convictions for 
selling loose goods by the pound, instead of in metric measures.
This will mark the culmination of the campaign by the British Weights & 
Measures Association to preserve choice in measures and the retention of the 
imperial system for those who want to use it. That happens to be over 75% of 
the population.
The BWMA was started in 1897 when the French revolutionary metric system first 
threatened our traditional measures. Although the metric system was made lawful 
at the time it was always voluntary and it made very little headway. The BWMA 
lapsed as the threat receded.
But in 1994 regulations were passed implementing the European Community 
directive 80/181/EEC, amended by 89/617/EEC, making it compulsory for the UK to 
use the metric system exclusively. Mr. Vivian Linacre, an accomplished Scots 
surveyor, decided to reinvigorate the BWMA to fight this unwarranted and 
unwanted imposition. He discovered that the EU only wanted us to go metric 
because it was jealous of the trading advantage the imperial system gave us 
over our European partners trading with the USA.

Vivian Linacre and a band of volunteers studied the complex weights & measures 
laws. They publicised the way that the metric system was imposed behind 
parliament's back and against the wishes of the people. BWMA gathered support 
from many quarters. A vital breakthrough came when barrister Michael Shrimpton 
discovered that the regulations outlawing the imperial system were themselves 
unlawful. The preservation of our traditional system of measures had become a 
colossal constitutional issue. Did parliament give up its independence when it 
passed the 1972 European Communities Act, our accession to the Common Market; 
was it entirely subjugated to European Union law, to mere Directives issued by 
officials in Brussels? If so then, sadly, our imperial measures have been 
terminated and the brave Metric Martyrs may lose their livelihoods. But if 
parliament has retained its sovereignty then the compulsory metrication 
regulations are indeed unlawful and the convictions of the Metric Martyrs must 
be quashed.
Can we trust the judges on Monday to reaffirm the promises made by past 
ministers that we really do still govern ourselves? Or has the pass been sold 
and is parliament consigned to impotence forever, a mere province of the 
European super power? Shall the battle go the House of Lords, even to the 
European courts?

Han
 
(P.S. Stephen, I am posting this from a public computer. I have to be at home 
to be able to give you an answer to your message. I have to check out what came 
in last night. Now I can just inform you that I only found a few messages from 
the list and a few SPAM messages in my mailbox.)

Reply via email to