You're right, Alfred Hu. It does, however, present the opportunity to draw attention to World standards - in this case, ISO 8601. Palindromes based on ad hoc date forms are bogus. Duncan
-----Original Message----- From: Hu, Alfred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: February 21, 2002 18:22 Subject: [USMA:18333] RE: It should be 200202202002, not 200220022002 >um... excuse me but aren't we getting off-topic with this thread of >discussion!!?? > >alfred >
