2002-03-27

What I meant was that a majority of the derived units are based on length,
mass, and time.  There are not that many that involve the other 4.

John



----- Original Message -----
From: "Barbara and/or Bill Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 2002-03-27 15:48
Subject: [USMA:19105] Re: watt seconds


> on 3/26/2002 6:16 PM, kilopascal at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > mechanical units form most of the base units for SI.
>
> It's of academic interest only, I suppose, but I disagree with the above.
>
> There are seven base units. One is electrical (the ampere), one is thermal
> (the kelvin), one is chemical (the mole) and one is used in illumination
> physics (the candela). That's four out of seven.
>
> Even if one accepts the suggestion that the other three (m, kg, s) are all
> "mechanical" (which I don't*), it is not accurate to state that "most" of
> the base units are mechanical. Three out of seven is not "most".
>
> Regards, Bill Hooper
> college physics teacher (retired), USA (Florida)
>
> *P.S.
> The other three base units are the kilogram, the second and the metre. Are
> they "mechanical units?
>
> The kilogram is just as important in thermal physics and maybe even more
> important in nuclear physics than it is in mechanical physics, so I don't
> accept the suggestion that the kilogram is purely a mechancial unit.
>
> Many things vary with time, including the electric and magnetic fields in
> electromagnetic waves (light, radio, etc.), transfer of thermal energy by
> heat flow, radioactive decay, and others. Therefore, I don't accept the
> notion that the second is purely a mechanical concept.
>
> Although the metre is certainly used in mechanical sense to describe
> position and velocity, etc. (surely mechanical concepts) it is also used
to
> describe thickness of barriers through which heat, light, sound, ionizing
> radiation, etc. may or may not pass and other things which are not
> necessarily "mechanical". So I can't even bring myself to classify the
metre
> as a purely mechanical unit.
>
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  Do It Easy, Do It Metric!
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>

Reply via email to