I have no problem at all with the FRN being touted as being a great
guide due to its breadth and conciseness. I do object to it being touted
as being the seminal document ("most authoritative") for the U.S. But
perhaps that is not what you intended in your comment (USMA:19184), upon
which I commented.Jim Gene Mechtly wrote: > > Why should U.S. teachers of measurement units and skills study "Metric > System of Measurement: Interpretation of the International System of > Units for the United States; Notice" published as a Federal Register > Notice in 1998; and also study NIST SP 330 of 2001 and SP 811 of 1995? .... > This SI triad is concerned with information and standard practices, > and has nothing to do with the prosecution of illegal acts. .... -- Metric Methods(SM) "Don't be late to metricate!" James R. Frysinger, CAMS http://www.metricmethods.com/ 10 Captiva Row e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charleston, SC 29407 phone/FAX: 843.225.6789
