> 1   Conservatives

I heard a comedian say that there were 'traditional' conservatives and
'modern' conservatives:
The traditional conservatives were "we don't want to be first with
anything"
The modern conservatives were "we are willing to change but not yet"


> a   Those who don't like to change may be simply people who never like
to
> change, the true conservatives, but it might also include those who
tried
> to
> change too early for the rest of the community and got burned by a
failed
> attempt - perhaps the NCTM fits into this category.

The National Geographic explicitly states that they are in this
category. Their failure was to define 'gradual change' as putting out
issues which had some articles totally in metric (articles that they
deemed 'scientific' articles) and some in old units. We need to learn
from this that some people simply do not understand how to manage
transition. This may be a feature of the USA which has a population that
has not really had to make any radical changes in recent history, and
has not had too much contact with other ways of doing things.


> 3   Traders
> These are the folk to attack, and to attack with vigor.

However, we should beware of how disputes are seen by third parties. The
UK metric martyrs exploited third party sympathy. No matter what the
technicalities of the case, many onlookers saw it as harassment to
lovable rogues trying to make a living. Audience opinion is often more
important than 'win' or 'lose'. I still see 'lb' only labels in UK
market stalls.

Even picking battles with big business can be problematical. When the US
'freedom' concept gets to implementation, 'freedom' and regulation are
portrayed as opposites. It is often the business freedom that gets more
sympathy than consumer freedom. For example the FCC wireless number
portability is debated as a conflict between these two freedoms whereas
in other countries the consumer freedom issue was largely unopposed.

Despite the actualities, many Americans think
America=freedom=no_regulation and foreign=oppressed=regulated. If the
words 'metric', 'foreign' and 'regulation' are combined it is pretty
easy to get anti-metric sympathy. So the PR has to be very carefully
handled.
--
Terry Simpson
Human Factors Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.connected-systems.com
Phone: +44 7850 511794 

Reply via email to