Marcus,
The CCU has already rejected No. 2 wrt SI prefixes; considered *alone*.
In my opinion, there is *no* prospect that the CCU would consider all five
of your suggestions in one package.
As Jim Frysinger suggested, the proper channel for your proposals
(as a citizen of Brazil, Canada, or both) is through your own representative(s)
to the CCU; with all the arguments you can muster in support of each
proposal, preferably, one at a time.
May you enjoy more success than I am able to boast (zero).
Gene.
........................................
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Marcus Berger wrote:
>
> ... I'd like to inquire with Gene about the possibility of
> a proposal to them that would ... include the
> following ... :
>
> 1. ... rigorous name derivation/definition/creation ...
>
> 2. ... capital letters for positive powers of 10 and small letters for
> negative powers of 10.
>
> 3. ... no new ... units would EVER include prefixes therein,...
>
> 4. ... consistency to new namings of ratios.
>
> 5. ... consistency to definition of units that would NOT allow for the
use of other base units as necessary, ...
>
> There, Gene, please consider this as an official proposal to be presented
> to them ...
