Yes Joe, and this is one of the main features of the format.

The series were on the basis that a drawing or picture that is made on any
format will fit perfectly if reduced or enlarged AND that in the same time
the development of the subformats are done through halves which is
associated with great savings in cutting the formats.

Once maintaining these initial conditions one gets to the sqrt2 ratio
between length and width. This is in fact the reason why the length and the
width of the A$ for ex. are not round cm or mm values.

Bottom line is that the format is hard metric as it has been designed based
on the metric system to begin with and is no soft converion of any other
unit of measurement. Therefore, ISO 216 is a metric standard in every
respect and on top of this it is the standard used by more than 90% of the
world.

We advocate metrication and one of the forte argument is that 96% of the
world used this standard. However paradoxically, we declare that USMA does
not advocate adopting international standards (which are used by the same
%). In other words we want metrication but we don't want to use metric
screws, bearings, printing media and so much more. Then why do we want
metrication to begin with? (this desrves a topic on it's own!)

Adrian.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Joseph B. Reid
Sent: Thursday, 25 April, 2002 15:38
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:19644] Re: Answer from MT editors


Jim Elwell wrote in USMA 19361:
.
>There is absolutely nothing that makes the ISO-sized papers inherently
>superior to American sizes. It is just a standard size, as American A, B,
>C, D, etc. are standard sizes. Sure, it has a metric basis, but that is
>totally meaningless (or unknown) to 99.9999% of all people who use it.


        17/22 = 0.773           841/1.189 = 0.707
        11/17 = 0.647           594/841 = 0.706
        8.5/11 = 0.773          420/594 = 0.707
        5.5/8.5 = 0.647         297/420 = 0.707
        4,25/5.5 = 0.773        210/297 = 0.707
        2.75/4.25 = 0.647       148/210 = 0.705
                                105/148 = 0.709

If you have a page layout that fits 5.5 by 8.5 it can't be enlarged to fit
8.5 by 11. If you have a page layout that fits 148 by 210 it can be
enlarged to a perfect fit with 210 by 297.

Joseph B.Reid
17 Glebe Road West
Toronto  M5P 1C8             Tel. 416 486-6071

Reply via email to