On Fri, 3 May 2002 20:28:32 kilopascal wrote: >2002-05-03 > >Marcus, > >My point of 10 g (mL), or 100 g was just an idea, not to be written in >stone. The increments would have to be agreed upon. It was meant to say: >"Ok, if we have to compromise, then let us have partial rationalisation. >Let's not be extremely rigid, but allow some flexibility. But only enough >to prevent anyone from trying to sneak in hidden FFU, such as 341 mL, 227 g, >etc. > I know, John. Understood. We're actually on the same side here, no problem.
>And the Robot from Lost in Space (not Lost in Spice) never said: "danger, >danger, danger' in the air!!! ". It said: "Danger, Danger, Will Robinson, >Danger!" > He, he... I stand corrected. :-) Marcus Is your boss reading your email? ....Probably Keep your messages private by using Lycos Mail. Sign up today at http://mail.lycos.com
