Joe, Try ISO/TC 12 (ISO 31), Quantities and Units.
I have tried the SI Brochure from BIPM. pp. 109-110, but I cannnot find anything there about the correctness of notations like 200 X 10 X 35 or 200 mm X 10 mm X 35 mm. I have always used the first form. Han Historian of Dutch Metrication, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph B. Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, 2002-06-22 19:53 Subject: [USMA:20568] 200 X 10 X 35 mm or 200 mm X 10 mm X 35 mm? > This topic led to a most prolonged discussion in USMA 20410 - 20414, 20416, 20418 - 20420, 20424, 20427, 20441, 20442, 20444 - 20448. 20451 - 20453, > 20456 - 20458, 20461, 20464 - 20467, 20469, 20472, 20480, 20481, 20483 - 20487, 20490 and 20495. > > Can anyone cite a BIPM or ISO or IEC document on this subject? Being Canadian, I don't recognize the authority of NIST 330, or NIST 811, or IEE/ASTM SI 10, Joseph B.Reid > 17 Glebe Road West > Toronto M5P 1C8 Tel. 416 486-6071 > > >
