Hi Friends:
     Whatever went wrong during introduction of the ‘metric system’; the objective failed to press for adoption and continuation of ‘Decimale Time scale’, which lasted for a mere 13 years. Attempts of The World Calendar Association, New York (USA) for adopting the International Fixed Calendar by Moses Burines Cotsworth and the discussions that followed at United Nations led to sine die adjournment of the Calendar Question (1956 April 26); till a better and promising proposal came before the World body that could remove the discrepancies in Gregorian calendar, and not cause the ‘Sabbath’ cycle to rotate when year/month/week cycles change.
    Disparity in Calendars is a known fact - especially in attempting to find the possibility of a global Dating system for documentation of events and international trade. In this connection, implementation of International Standard ISO: 8601-1988 on Descending Order Dating can be the starting point and leading to yyyy - ww - dd / hr-md-sd format for date writing.  
    THE LEAP WEEK RULE: An 896-year span shall have 327257.01010776 days, to account 159 ‘leap weeks’. All years shall have 52 weeks, OTHER THAN THOSE YEARS DIVISIBLE BY SIX (6), which shall have an added 53rd week as the leap week of the year. In addition, only TEN (10) inter-calary leap weeks need be included at a frequency of every 90-years - the first three (3) years later (i.e. during 93rd year) and the last three (3) years earlier (i.e. during 87th year), if 896TH year itself happen to be divisible by SIX (6). An accumulated ‘under accounted’ error of only ONE DAY shall creep into after a long period of 88644.6237035 years (say, 88645 years).
    As against this, the Gregorian calendar accumulates such error in about 3320 years. In 400 years, (365400=146000 + 24x3 +1 =146097 days) are accounted. But, actual time elapsed is 365.2421987125 400 =146096.879485 days. This, over accounts 0.120515 day in 400 years or 1 day in 3319.0889001 years.
    Does it make sense and lead the calendar towards ‘ZERO ERROR’?
    Healthy criticism/views are welcome!
BRIJ BHUSHAN VIJ ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to