California is still squarely in the SI camp. I believe New York is too. Funnily enough, a Google search on "NYDOT and SI" leads to my SI Navigator site as the first hit. As I haven't updated the site in some time, I'm not going to regard it as authoritative. =[:o)>
"Caltrans and SI," on the other hand, yields their own statement on the issue (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/metric/metdoc1.htm) and it's unambiguous. As for the other SI-compliant state DOTs, perhaps Jim Frysinger has something more up to date. Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Bob Price > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 17:11 > To: U.S. Metric Association > Subject: [USMA:21003] Highway construction > > > I was wondering about the status of metrics and highway construction. In > Yahoo's Metric America site someone mentioned that the FWHA is > now requiring > all states to go back to US Imperial units in road construction. Is this > true? If not, are there any states still using metric in road > construction? > I have been off the list server for quite awhile, so I have not > been in the > loop as to what is going on lately here. > > Any insights into how the Bush administration is treating the > metric system? > Is he just ignoring it? I haven't found too much metric news lately. > >
