Dear John and All,

Hear! hear!

Regards,

Pat Naughtin CAMS
Geelong, Australia

on 2002-07-14 02.03, kilopascal at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 2002-07-13
> 
> Jim,
> 
> I'm going to disagree with you for the following reasons:
> 
> Will the Authorities on SI ever recognise these other expressions as "energy
> units" or just equivalence's to the joule?  It is the coherency that you
> mention that allows us to recombine different units to equate to the joule,
> but that doesn't take away from the joule its position as the sole energy
> unit in SI.
> 
> By your argument, I can say that length can be expressed in the unit of
> joules per newton, or newton seconds squared per kilogram, etc.  Even though
> one can express length this way I don't think it could or would take away
> the uniqueness of the metre as the sole SI unit of length.  The same is true
> for the joule.
> 
> The hour not only is not a coherent unit with SI, it isn't even an SI unit.
> A unit such as the hour, that may have a special status (accepted) for use
> with SI, does not make it an SI unit. The resultant combination of an SI
> unit with a non-SI unit is still a non-SI unit.  By your logic, we should
> accept the FFU as a part of SI because they can be combined with SI (farads
> per foot, grams per mile, watts per square inch, etc.).  Of course, like the
> hour they would not be coherent and would relate with an odd conversion
> factor.
> 
> I don't think so!
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James R. Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, 2002-07-13 11:17
> Subject: [USMA:21025] Re: Fwd: Energy unit TWH
> 
> 
>> kilopascal wrote:
>>> 
>>> 2002-07-13
>>> 
>>> The terawatt-hour is not an SI unit.  There is only one SI energy unit,
> the
>>> joule.  The terawatt-hour is a combination of an SI unit, the watt and
> the
>>> non-SI time unit, the hour.
>>> 
>>> The watt-hour is a unit accepted with limited use along with SI, but it
> in
>>> itself is not SI.
>> ....
>> 
>> John,
>> 
>> I have to disagree with you here. The joule is a specially named derived
>> unit provided for energy. But other derived units, without special
>> names, can be and are used to express quantities of energy, such as the
>> newton meter, the watt second, the pascal cubic meter, and so on.
>> 
>> Marvelously, due to the coherence of the system, the numerical factor
>> that relates each item in that short list above to the joule is "1".
>> Since the hour is accepted for use with the SI, the watt hour can be
>> used to represent quantities of energy, but since the hour is not a
>> coherent unit within the SI, the conversion factor is
>> 1 W.h = 3.6 kJ
>> with the period on the line in W.h representing the raised dot for
>> multiplication.
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> --
>> Metric Methods(SM)           "Don't be late to metricate!"
>> James R. Frysinger, LCAMS    http://www.metricmethods.com/
>> 10 Captiva Row               e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Charleston, SC 29407         phone: 843.225.6789
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to