Brij, I'm sorry, but ANY calendar reform that would upset the 7-day cycle would face a **VERY** stiff opposition! It's a *definite* no-no! And, again, I see no benefit at all of NOT going *full decimal* in terms of the time construct. If we are to upset the duration of the second (as you clearly propose) we might as well support a *pure* decimal framework. A 20 x 100 x 100, or 24 x 100 x 100, etc would just *not cut it* (sorry, my friend, but I had to be blunt about this).
Marcus On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:19:42 BB VIJ wrote: >Hi Markus, Joe, Adrian and All: > I am not sure how serious have you been in discarding my attempts in Calendar >Reform. But, one thing for sure: I find little enthusiasm among the letters I have >viewed so far. However, I am attaching (a file 335 Kb) along exctracts out of my >published articles and I would wish if there are any serious minds to make United >Nations to re-examine the Calendar Question. >Brij Bhushan Vij mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >2108 Henry Court, MAHWAH, NJ 07430-3805 >TeleFax: +1(201)684-0907 Is your boss reading your email? ....Probably Keep your messages private by using Lycos Mail. Sign up today at http://mail.lycos.com
