Madan:

The characteristics you just described apply to all numbering systems,
regardless of the radix.

In the hexadecimal system, for example, 30 + 10 = 40 too. It's just that 30,
10 and 40 represent different values in the hexadecimal system from those
they represent in the decimal (or octal, or duodecimal) system.

In any system, 30 represents 3 times the radix, 40 represents 4 times the
radix, 100 represents the square of the radix, 2000 represents two times the
cube of the radix, and so on.

Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of M R
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 05:48
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:21602] Fwd: Re: Proposal For World Calendar
>
>
> The reason for using decimal system is the simplicity
> of + , - , * and /.
>
> 30 + 10 = 40 (just add 1 # to the left digit)
> 50 - 10 = 40 (subtract 1 # from left digit)
> 40 * 10 = 400 (add another 0)
> 5000 / 10 = 500 (remove a 0)
>
> Its mostly a matter adding and removing 0.
> This simplicity cannot be found in any other # system.
>
> Madan
>
>
>
> --- "Joseph B. Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 20:57:35 -0400
> > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph B. Reid)
> > Subject: [USMA:21568] Re: Proposal For World
> > Calendar
> >
> > Brij Bhushan Vij and Marcus Berger have proposed
> > several iconoclastic
> > improvements to the metric system. They don't go far
> > enough. First we
> > should reform the number system, and then build a
> > new metric system on that
> > foundation.
> > I have a set of tables, "Duodecimal Arithmetic"
> > (radix twelve) by George S.
> > Terry, published in 1938 by Longmans, Green. It
> > contains 407 pages of
> > mathematical tables of factors, fractions,
> > factorials, reciprocal
> > factorials, powers, reciprocal powers, squares,
> > cubes, square roots, cube
> > roots, reciprocals, trignometrical functions of
> > common angles, conversion
> > of angles, conversion of time, sin, cos, tan, n cot
> > n, logarithms, log
> > trignometric functions, napierian logarithms, log
> > sin, log cos, log tan in
> > radians, exponential, sine and cosine integrals,
> > factorial function,
> > digamma function, Bessel functions, interpolation
> > coefficients.
> >
> > Truly a labor of love, It was achieved BC (before
> > computers) using a
> > modified Munroe calculator that used parts from
> > Munroe sterling
> > calculators.
> >
> > Joseph B.Reid
> > 17 Glebe Road West
> > Toronto  M5P 1C8             Tel. 416 486-6071
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
> http://www.hotjobs.com
>

Reply via email to