----- Original Message -----
From: "kilopascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 6:16 PM
Subject: [USMA:21915] Re: question


> 2002-08-25
>
> There are none.  Old and obsolete information states Burma (Myanmar) and
> Liberia are not metric, but information from people who have visited these
> countries states otherwise.  Both countries are very poor, with Liberia
> presently and for a long time in the midst of a civil war.  Goods and
> services entering these countries comes from neighbouring countries which
> are 100 % metric, thus even if these countries never made an official
> commitment, they have changed none the less.
>
> No country is 100 % metric, just like the US is not 100 % FFU.  There is
> some degree of non-metric use in all countries, but the amount is minimal.

> Older unit names still persist in many countries, but they have been
> standardised to rational metric values, (such as 1 pound being equal to
500
> g) and are strictly used in slang speech.

this is wrong, e.g. in Germany only old people use pound! in former USSR a
pound has never existed!

> No device exists to measure these old units.  For example, if an
Australian asks for a pound of ham at the
> deli counter, the attendant will weigh out 500 g on a pure metric scale,
> price it at 500 g and as far as the store is concerned only a metric
amount
> was vended.  The customer who has no clue as to what a pound is, just the
> use of the name, does not feel cheated if he/she did not get exactly what
he
> asked for based on the American concept of a pound, that is 454 g.
>
> I hope this answered your question.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Terri E Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, 2002-08-25 10:37
> Subject: [USMA:21914] question
>
>
> > Trying to find information for a class project - need to know name of
two
> > countries - not including the U.S. - who do NOT use the metric system.
> > Thanks to anyone who can help.
> > terri
> >
>

Reply via email to