I did it in one, and received the appropriate acknowledgement. However, I agree that the method is ridiculously complicated.
Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >Behalf Of Pat Naughtin >Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 15:37 >To: U.S. Metric Association >Subject: [USMA:22280] Re: ] failure to establish metric newsgroup > > >Dear All, > >It took me three sessions to get my vote through. But I got there >eventually. > >Cheers, > >Pat Naughtin CAMS >Geelong, Australia > >on 2002-09-23 08.11, Wizard of OS at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> the vote procedure is too complicated >> >> I did it after my second run! >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: U.S. Metric Association >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:00 AM >> Subject: [USMA:22278] Re: ] failure to establish metric newsgroup >> >> >> In a message dated 2002-09-22 16:22:09 Eastern Daylight Time, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> >> >> >> So what do people think about the fact that the newsgroup failed? >> >> >> I tried to vote yes, but the form would not work. It said I >hadn't changed >> anything in it, even though I inserted the word YES. >> >> I don't understand the concept that a vote is needed to start a >newsgroup. >> >> cm >> >
