A brief on metrication in the media is featured on the
current
aatideas in Brief e-zine mirrored on the web at
http://www.aatideas.org/web.html
and the paragraph is also included below (with permission)
> As more media organizations in the United States
feature
> the use of metric measures in providing content,
progress
> is made in the use and development of an important
> technical literacy. Even with the use of other
traditional
> units of measure in the United States, the metric
system
> has become widely known. In the United States the
metric
> system is already the principal system of measure for
areas
> of science, engineering, and medicine. Thus media
content
> should reflect the use of metric measures in news
about
> areas of science, engineering, and medicine. As the
metric
> system is also a principal system of measure
throughout
> most of the world, the use of traditional units of
measure
> should not be attributed to news content that is
provided
> in metric terms from other regions. The development or
> use of a system of measurement may be approached with
> reference to applicable guidelines for use.
I checked the Associated Press stylebook and reviewed its
guidelines on the use of the metric system. I don't know
whether this reflects the most current stylebook
guidelines,
however the 1998 edition has an entry on the metric system
on pp 127-8.
It generally advises the use of metric units when they are
'relevant'
yet doesn't address what units are actually known or
accepted
in the United States.
There are also some guidelines re the specification of time
on pp 203-204 that elaborate a little more about certain
rationales for the use of particular time units.
As I see it this is basic support _for_ the use of metric
measures in a story, however rationales for the use of
metric measures among the US media are not consistently
manifest in media content.
And so I am wondering about strategies for helping more
of the media in the US to be more clear about the use of
metric measures in media content.
Ron
ps -- this perspective does reflect the present course of
AAT ideas programming.
--
Ronald L. Stone, programs manager
Alliance for the Advancement of Technology (AAT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aatideas.org
AAT at www.aatideas.org
PO Box 141155
Mpls., MN 55414-1155
USA
Ronald L. Stone, programs manager
Alliance for the Advancement of Technology (AAT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aatideas.org
AAT at www.aatideas.org
PO Box 141155
Mpls., MN 55414-1155
USA
