On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 08:04:57 Jim Elwell wrote: >At 11:41 PM 7, October 2002 -0700, Ma Be wrote: >>Please, John and Jim, allow me to add a new... perspective into this >>interesting debate, albeit their being sort of already discussed before... > >Marcus, as you note, you and I have gone rounds on this several times over >the years.
Indeed! :-) And once in a while it... "resurfaces" again. At least it's good for those arriving at the group recently since they get exposed to such issues and are able to participate and engage in such discussions. > Usually I manage to harangue people until they give up arguing, >but in your case I have met my match. I'll let your comments stand without >repost. > >This time, at least.... > He, he... :-) That's ok. But I'd evidently be happier if my argumentations would make more positive contributions towards your acceptance or at least understanding of them better! (And I think that deep down you do, since you seem to be demonstrating that more often during these years. A big thank you for that, my dear friend) >Regards, >Jim >... Same to you. And sorry if I... "overdid" it by sending so many posts on this discussion lately (yesterday night I had some free time and decided to spend a few hours doing it. It helps keep my writing skills sharp... ;-) ) Marcus Is your boss reading your email? ....Probably Keep your messages private by using Lycos Mail. Sign up today at http://mail.lycos.com
