Terry Simpson wrote: >However 'cubic cm' or 'cm3' would be fine. In fact, it would be >excellent since ml is not an SI unit whereas cm3 is.
Joseph B. Reid wrote: >Terry's impression would have been correct from 1901 until 1964. [...] >The litre was redefined as 1 dm3 by the 12th CGPM in 1964, [...] >The litre is a "Non-SI unit accepted for use with the International System" I am not sure what you mean. I said that the ml is not an SI unit. Are you saying that it is or it isn't?
