Oh Carl, we certainly need more people like you.

Rational, level-headed and sensible.

Well done.

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Sorenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: [USMA:22884] My response to recent postings


| I agree with what several of you said about keeping posts culturally
| sensitive, intelligent, non-offensive, etc.  Here are my thoughts.
|
| 1.  I suppose that many Americans do tend to have insular or less
| cosmopolitan attitudes than Europeans, due to geographic, demographic,
| political, and economic realities (such the fact that the US is one big
| country, rather than dozens of countries next to each other).
|
| 2.  This is entirely their prerogative.
|
| 3.  The purpose of USMA is not to make the US more "global" or "nice to
| Europe" or anything like that, as agreeable as those things may be.  Its
| purpose is to encourage metrication.
|
| 4.  We will make progress toward metrication by a) educating and helping
the
| public accept, understand, and use SI, and b) influencing key political,
| educational, and industrial leaders to make helpful policies,
legislation,
| and products.
|
| 5.  In order to influence the public and its leaders, we need to have a
| worthwhile message and a reputation as a rational, intelligent,
| professional, and mainstream organization.  I think that most USMA
members
| (and certainly its leaders) understand this, but a few people on this
list
| aren't convinced yet.
|
| 6.  Since our purpose is metrication, it doesn't matter if countries
drive
| on the left side of the road, use dollar bills or coins, or write the
date
| and time in various ways.  Insisting that everyone does everything a
certain
| way is unnecessary, distracting, and detrimental to our public relations.
| PR is, I think, pretty much the main point of USMA.
|
| 7.  Inflexible rigidity and obsession with inconsequential minutiae is
| called extremism. We will be marginalized and people will leave if we
become
| extremist.
|
| 8.  The vast majority of people are not engineers.  They don't want to be
| and they don't need to be.  SI is obviously the best system for
scientific
| purposes.  Although it is best for everyday life, too, people won't be
| convinced of that if we just call them stupid or irrational.  They will
| respond much more positively to respect, tolerance, patience, and
cultural
| sensitivity.  What may be obvious and important for scientists and
engineers
| will not be that big a deal for the public.  By contrast, grammar and
| punctuation are important to linguists, but not every engineer considers
| them important.  A healthy person tries to balance things in life.
|
| Carl
|
|
|
|
|
|

Reply via email to