Dear Jim,

Thanks for the links. I have checked them and I have interspersed some
remarks.

on 2002-11-15 09.18, Jim Elwell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> At 11/15/2002, 09:05 AM, Pat Naughtin wrote:
> 
>> on 2002-11-14 03.08, Jim Elwell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 
>> <snip>
>>> "Another area for experimental economics has to do with NASA. We worked
>> on the
>>> Cassini mission [which in 1997 sent 800 pounds of scientific
>> instruments on a
>>> small spacecraft to Saturn to conduct experiments]. We used a trading
>> system
>>> to allocate the resources that each separate experiment got to use on
>> board.
>> <snip>
>> 
>> I know that this is a complete red herring but it is interesting that NASA
>> chose to report the mass of the scientific experiments as "800 pounds".
>> 
>> How long is it going to take for NASA to realise the cost of the Mars
>> Climate Orbiter?
> 
> I was quoting Vernon Smith from an interview in a political magazine, so I
> don't think we can presume that the spacecraft was designed in inch-pound
> units. At least some of the press releases were clearly done in metric. See
> 
> http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press-releases-97/19971015-pr-b.cfm

>From the way this news release was written I suspect that the writer was
working from SI units, translating to foot-pound units, and then placing
these into parentheses.

> Also, the craft launched in 1997, which is before the Mars Orbiter fiasco
> (if memory serves).

This is true, but I think that NASA had already 'gone metric' and if a
project wanted to use old units they required a special approval. However,
while this might have been true for the engineering departments it did not
impinge on the public relations department.

Given that "Cassini-Huygens is a cooperative mission of NASA, the European
Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency" I doubt that the approval for
using old units was even sought.

> Finally, this is an international project. From
> http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/index.cfm:

Fascinating stuff. Thanks again for the links.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin CAMS
Geelong, Australia

Reply via email to