Dear Bill, Shouldn't we prefer units that have a coherent unit in the denominator in which case L/Mm would become �L/m (that's microlitre per metre)?
Cheers, Pat Naughtin CAMS Geelong, Australia on 2002-11-16 08.22, Bill Potts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Pay Naughtin wrote: >> There seems to be a problem with the larger prefixes but only when they are >> associated with the metre. For example, I have rarely heard or >> seen the word megametre in any context. > > You mean you haven't see fuel consumption rated in dekaliters per megameter > (daL/Mm)? <g> > > (Actually, I'm trying to decide whether or not that would be an improvement > over L/100 km. I think my preference, though, would be for L/Mm.) > > Bill Potts, CMS > Roseville, CA > http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] >
