>> You mean you haven't see fuel consumption rated in dekalitres >> per megameter (daL/Mm)? <g> >> >> (Actually, I'm trying to decide whether or not that would >> be an improvement over L/100 km. >> I think my preference, though, would be for L/Mm.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The Honda Accord would then be rated at 98 L/Mm. > You could also describe this using SI units as 98 m^3/km. > A pure SI description would be 0.098 m2 If you want us to give up miles-per-gallon, give us km-per-litre, at least. The inverse measurement of fuel OVER distance makes no sense at all.
