Han,

I think you may have over-reacted to this article - it wasn't supposed to be anti-metric. For instance the sentence:-

" Eventually, he says, Americans will fully adjust. The metric system was meant to be global, and the meter created by the surveyors has become the worldwide standard. "

indicates that the SI system will be accepted and the article didn't say that the small error mattered:-

"The irony of the situation was that his mistake didn't matter. The scientists who created the meter wanted it to be close to the commonly used yard (or aune, in France), so Delambre and Mechain's mission was, in many ways, a fait accompli".

Hope this helps

Regards and Season's Greetings

Mike

 

----- Original Message -----
From: Han Maenen
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 2:51 PM
Subject: [USMA:23805] CNN article

The CNN article about the metric system angered me so much that I sent this
message through their feed back page:

"The article by Todd Leopold about the 'wrong' metric system has angered me.
Another of these American attacks on the metric system. If the metric system
is wrong, I suppose that it should be replaced globally by American units. I
challenge Mr. Leopold to find out about the Mendenhall Order of 1893 and
about an agreement by English speaking non-metric countries in 1959 about
the standardization of their Imperial and US Customary measuring units. He
will find out that the 'wrong' metric system now defines all those splendid
and vastly superior American units."






Han
Historian of Dutch Metrication, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Reply via email to