I am going to order it. But all comments I have read about the book were
anti-metric. That comment on CNN last week angered me.
The committee that was set up in 1790 to set up a new system of units
thought about using base 12, but decided against it.

Han



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Elwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 2002-12-09 21:23
Subject: [USMA:23862] Measure of all things


> Just finished Ken Alder's book, The Measure of All Things. A very
interesting and informative read, certainly *not* anti-metric in any way.
 Learned a bit more French from from it, too.

 One issue got me thinking: some professions wanted a measurement standard
based on 12, so that things could be easily divided into halves, quarters,
thirds, etc.
>
> Just imagine: if humans were born with six fingers on each hand (perhaps
two opposable thumbs), or 12 fingers total, then:
>
> * "decimal" would mean base-12
> * it would be trivial to convert between common fractions and decimal
numbers (e.g., 1/3 = 0.4)
> * this would make the issue of fractions in commerce vs. decimals in
science largely moot
> * our clocks would be almost identical to current clocks (based on 24).
> * there could still be 360 degrees in a circle, and it would seem like a
nice, round number
> * etc.
>
> Perhaps with modern genetic engineering we can create 12-fingered humans,
redefine the entire SI system on base-12, and be happy with our clocks and
degrees.

 Jim Elwell

> P.S. don't take this seriously -- this is just a bit of daydreaming



Reply via email to