Regarding the post re trying to persuade runners to adapt to the metric
concept of 5 km runs, I have been trying to do this for some years now,
with rather mixed success. As an experienced road and trail runner myself,
I have tried:
Reminding runners that a sister sport, xc skiing, is totally metric and
never uses miles. Not much response here.
Telling runners that measuring speed and distance is really easier using km
rather than miles. A little success here.
Simply always using km in conversation and in writing (I am the eMail guy
for a local running club). Pretty successful, but still not very
persuasive in actually getting other people to change their behavior.
Badgering race organizers using miles to convert. Not successful. There
are some races that may remain in miles for years, such as those with
historic names ("Western States 100 Mile Endurance Run") and those which
involve support crews needing to know where to drive cars to relay points
(the car odometers being in miles).
Making my own km distance signs and loaning them out for use in local
races, the idea being that if a race is a 10 km, the interval signs should
also be metric. Also arranging to measure the new distances
myself. Pretty good success here, with no complaints and some compliments.
Always using km in talking to high school students, whom I coach in track
in the spring. Somewhat successful, but difficult when I am the only coach
doing so--even though all running events have been metric for years now. I
still don't know if kids really know a kilometer from a snowball.
But overall, there is a lot of lethargy and a "why bother" attitude in the
running community. Progress is not what I would call rapid!
HARRY WYETH
- [USMA:24209] Re: 5 "K" runs Harry Wyeth
- [USMA:24209] Re: 5 "K" runs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [USMA:24212] Re: 5 "K" runs kilopascal
- [USMA:24210] Re: 5 "K" runs kilopascal
- [USMA:24214] Re: 5 "K" runs Pat Naughtin
