2002-12-26

It is only a positive sign if the authors and reviewers are ignored.  But,
if they are able to damage any progress, they can not be ignored!

John


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nat Hager III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "kilopascal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "U.S. Metric Association"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 2002-12-26 10:41
Subject: RE: [USMA:24245] How the West Was Measured, One Chain at a Time.htm


> Sure. Metric is looming large enough on the horizon that opponents are
> becoming defensive.  Authors see the trend and view it as an opportunity
to
> write books.
>
> Consider it as a positive sign!
>
> Nat
>
> >>>>
> 2002-12-26
>
> I find it odd that all of a sudden we are being inundated with books that
> have a measurement theme.   It strikes me odd that both books written and
> reviewed this year have an underlying anti-metric theme.  This books seems
> to come at us from a different angle.  Instead of concentrating on
> non-existent errors in the early calculation of the metre, this book tends
> to glorify the measurement of the American continent in links, chains,
> yards, acres and miles.
>
> One should be asking why are these books appearing?  This one seems to be
> saying: "America, you can't go metric.  FFU is ingrained in our soil.  You
> can't measure your personal land in metres, it was already done so by the
> blood and sweat of American pioneers in chains and miles.  You would be
> destroying so much if you abandon our earth bound and honoured units for
> those foreign, artificial and abstract units of the metric system.  And
look
> folks, even in metric countries, the people resist and still use our
natural
> units"
>
> The 2-nd last paragraph of the review attacks Europe because it is the
> inventor of metric and Canada because they  defied the FFU-ists and went
> metric, only to stop half-way creating confusion.  And if the US ever
thinks
> of going metric, this is where we will be.
>
> I feel these books are designed to give comfort to the US for not
> metricating and sticking with FFU.  It is like they are saying: "No matter
> how much the world is against you, you are right in sticking with FFU, and
> you will win in the end.  But, you must continue to be on guard and fight,
> because the Hitlers and Stalins and Husseins of the metric world want to
> destroy you by forcing you to adopt their phoney measurements."
>
> When will someone write a book praising SI?  That is what we need.
>
> John
> >>>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nat Hager III
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Sent: Thursday, 2002-12-26 05:05
> Subject: [USMA:24245] How the West Was Measured, One Chain at a Time.htm
>
>
> Appeared in the NY Times this morning...
>
> Nat.
>
>

Reply via email to