2002-12-30

You say the Montgomery County School System in Maryland is committed to the
SI.  Can you explain how they teach SI?  Do you know for sure how they teach
it?  For example, do they teach SI as a primary system with actual hands on
experience using SI measuring devices?  Or, do they teach SI as a subset to
FFU?  In other words, is their method to teach FFU and when SI is
introduced, all that is taught is how to convert SI to FFU?

Whatever the method, teaching SI to the students is like teaching Esperanto
to American students.  Five minutes after you learn it, you forget it as you
have no practical means to use it.  This is why it is important to at least
metricate those parts of the economy that would reinforce the teaching, such
as grocery store scales, media weather forecasts, gasoline sales, and road
signs.

Without some form of metrication taking place in the real world, the
educational aspect of it is a waste of time and money.

John



----- Original Message -----
From: "G. Stanley Doore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 2002-12-30 09:21
Subject: [USMA:24275] Re: If War Comes


> Not much has changed.
>
> US Marine infantry types still use yards whereas Marine artillery and
other
> weapon systems are metric.  It's still a mixture.
>
> We must have the SI taught in schools rather than any old metric system so
> kids know and understand the relationship of units in the single common
> language of measurement worldwide.  It's necessary if they want to get
good
> science and technology jobs.  The Montgomery County School System here in
> Maryland is committed to the SI.
>
> Stan Doore
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Ressel" Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 8:47 AM
> Subject: [USMA:24274] If War Comes
>
>
> No, its not the Iraq version, this has to do with a book I found at a used
> book fair written in 1938 by R. Ernest Dupuy and George Fielding Eliot. It
> discusses the military situation in 1937, very spooky reading about how
they
> thought the US should stay out of the war and that we would never be able
to
> recover the Philippines if we lost them.
>
> What is interesting (at least for this list) is that the book mixes metric
> and English units throughout. One table of rifles for different countries
is
> a real hodgepodge. The  country and type of rifle is listed along with it
> effective and maximum range. Effective ranges are listed in yards for all
> countries while maximum ranges are listed in meters for France, German,
> Italy, Japan, Czechoslovakia and Spain, listed in Yards for Great  Britain
> and the US and listed in paces for Russia. Most distance in the book are
in
> yards and miles but almost all munition caliber are listed in mm. The main
> exception is battle ship guns all listed in inches.
>
>
> Howard Ressel
> Project Design Engineer, Region 4
> (585) 272-3372
>
>

Reply via email to