Title: Re: [USMA:24361] The Measure of All Things
Bill Potts wrote in  USMA 24361:

In October, Ken Alder, the author of The Measure of All Things, gave a
one-hour talk (including a question and answer period) at a bookstore in
Winnetka, IL.



I recommend the bo0k.  It contains much fascinating detail about the survey of M�chain and Delambre.  However, Alder is no physicist.  He gives an incorrect description of the 1793 draft metric system and he got the ratios of the pre-revolutionary monetary system interchanged.   His sub-title "Hidden Error that Transformed the World" is quite unjustified by the text, in which he states  "the final determination of the meter was based on the very data they [M�chain and Delambre] had been sent to supersede".  He goes on in the next paragraph to state "Seven years of labor had only succeeded in making the meter less accurate".

On page 250 Alder wrote "the earth's radius at the poles was 1/300 (or 0.3 percent) shorter than its radius at the equator".   I would rephrase that as "the radius of curvature of the meridians of longitude is 1/300 greater at the poles than at the equator".  It is true that the distance to the center of the earth is less from the poles than from the equator.  However, the distance on the surface of the earth between latitude 89� and the pole is greater than the distance from the equator to latitude 1�.  I admit that I am not sure how "aplatissement " was defined.

 
--
Joseph B. Reid
17 Glebe Road West
Toronto  M5P 1C8                Telephone 416-486-6071



Reply via email to