Thanks for your kind comments, Nat. It was so easy to design this, in fact I designed it myself and got an architect to formally draw the plans.
 
When living in Canada, I started using mm-only way back in 1974 when I built an extra bedroom for my new arrival.
 
Best regards
 
Mike
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: [USMA:24386] Building in Metric

Nice picture Mike!

BTW, let me concur with your mm-only approach. I've been using mm-only
around the lab and house for years, and its *just plain easier* to use one
multiplier consistently rather than be shifting a decimal back and forth one
place. Millimeters gives you the resolution to do most fine work without
fractions and decimals, and thinking in "blocks" of 100 mm and 1000 mm
becomes quite natural after a while. The point is you're *always* using the
same unit, whether it's for measuring a sample size, cropping graphics for
insertion in a Word document, measuring propagation distance in a microwave
transmission line, or fixing your mother's picture frame.

It's an "acquired" skill, but works quite well once you acquire it.

Nat

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mike Joy
Sent: Monday, 2003 January 06 1.07
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:24386] Building in Metric


Hi all,

Here is a picture of yours truly (left) with the builder (right) in the dead
of winter six months ago.

We are studying the plans of the extensions to my home, which are all in mm.
(The next storey/story was yet to be added.)

But now I'm very pleased with the results (where I'm writing now) and hope
it won't be too long before all American builders will see the light and
measure this way.

Best regards to you all,

Mike Joy,
Perth,
W Australia


Reply via email to