2003-01-20

A couple of more differences would be that imperial uses/used the long ton
and US customary uses the short ton.  Also, US Customary still recognises
the pre-1960 definition of the inch and foot.  They are still used in
surveying.

I think if you really look closely at the two "systems", you will find more
differences then similarities.

John


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 2003-01-20 17:47
Subject: [USMA:24534] RE: Non Metric Recipe Du Jour


> Brenton:
>
> I note that, in your email to Richard Rowand, you refer to "U.S.
imperial."
>
> You should note that U.S. measures and Imperial measures are different and
> there is, in fact, no such thing as "U.S. imperial."
>
> The most commonly accepted term for U.S. measures is "U.S. Customary." It
> differs from "Imperial" (which is British) in quite a few ways, including
> (but, by no means limited to) the values for pints, quarts, gallons, fluid
> ounces, tons, and bushels. And, of course, it does not include the
> peculiarly British "stone" and "hundredweight."
>
> The commonly-accepted term that is applicable to both U.S. and Imperial
> measures is "inch/pound." Around here, we use some less acceptable terms,
> including FFU (Fred Flintstone Units), for any inch/pound measures, and
> WOMBAT (Way Of Measuring Badly in America Today), for U.S. Customary. An
> alternative interpretation of WOMBAT (Waste Of Money, Brains And Time)
could
> be said to apply to inch/pound generally.
>
> Bill Potts, CMS
> Roseville, CA
> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
> Brenton
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 14:12
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:24533] Non Metric Recipe Du Jour
> Importance: High
>
>
> I received a reply to my second email sent to Recipe Du Jour.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Rowand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 20 January 2003 22:19
> To: Brenton
> Subject: Re: Metric
> Importance: High
>
>
> While I personally feel that America should adopt metric usage, my recipe
> software doesn't display or figure both imperial and metric. My apologies
> for the inconvenience.
>
>
> At 08:48 PM 1/19/03, you wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brenton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 January 2003 12:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Metric
> Importance: High
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> RE: http://www.recipedujour.com/
>
> I read about your website in an article in our Sunday newspaper.  After I
> subscribed to your daily recipes, I noted they are all in the US imperial
> system.
>
> As I have been educated on the metric system, I have been frustrated that
it
> has been necessary for me to change your measurement settings from US
> imperial to metric in order to follow the recipes.
>
> Whilst I understand that the USA is the only major country which has
> retained the imperial system of measurement,
> Australia and other countries that you send your emails to have been
metric
> for many decades.  I believe your site should also be available in the
> metric system for those countries which have made this productive change.
>
> Could you please advise why your recipes are not available in metric
units?
>
> Regards,
> Brenton Conway
> PO Box 10021 BC
> ADELAIDE SA  5000
> Australia
>
> Tel: +61 405 448 621
>

Reply via email to