Again, it's Dennis Brownridge's call.

Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
>Behalf Of Jim Elwell
>Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 15:53
>To: U.S. Metric Association
>Subject: [USMA:24884] RE: Definitions of US non-metric units
>
>
>Ok by me, if Bill were inclined to adopt the idea.
>
>Jim Elwell
>
>At 2/17/2003, 06:23 PM, kilopascal wrote:
>>2003-02-17
>>
>>Instead of "precise" and "typical, what about "actual" and "practical"?
>>
>>John
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Jim Elwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Monday, 2003-02-17 10:18
>>Subject: [USMA:24876] RE: Definitions of US non-metric units
>>
>>
>> > At 2/16/2003, 02:51 PM, Bill Potts wrote:
>> > >Dennis Brownridge and I have anticipated that very need, Terry.
>> > >
>> > >Just go to http://metric1.org/nonsi.htm.
>> > >
>> > >Bill Potts, CMS
>> > >Roseville, CA
>> > >http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
>> >
>> > Bill:
>> >
>> > As always, there is more to your website than I realized. I've
>bookmarked
>> > this non-metric-unit conversion page for reference, and will
>be referring
>> > my (captive) students to it.
>> >
>> > However, I'm puzzled by the widely varying precision in the conversion
>> > factors. You say that precision is shown as "appropriate," but
>I can't see
>> > why cubic foot deserves 8 significant digits while gallon gets only 4.
>> > Fluid ounce gets 5, cup gets 3 (or 2).
>> >
>> > I would suggest two columns: "precise" (with maybe six digits for
>> > everything) and "typical" (rounded as appropriate). That way I
>can have a
>> > "cup" as 240 mL for typical use, or 236.59 mL if I want the
>more precise
>>value.
>> >
>> > Actually cup illustrates the problem: there are some listserver members
>>who
>> > would suggest it should be rounded to 250 for typical use, not
>240, but if
>> > only the rounded value is shown, it makes it difficult for the user to
>> > round as appropriate to their use.
>> >
>> >
>> > Jim Elwell, CAMS
>> > Electrical Engineer
>> > Industrial manufacturing manager
>> > Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
>> > www.qsicorp.com
>> >

Reply via email to