I just took another look at my IEEE/ASTM SI 10-1997. Under the document number, it says, parenthetically, Revision and Redesignation of ANSI/IEEE Std 268-1992 and ASTM E 380.
So, you can take it from that that IEEE 268 is obsolete. Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >Behalf Of Bill Potts >Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 09:27 >To: U.S. Metric Association >Subject: [USMA:24915] RE: IEEE 268 vs. IEEE/ASTM SI 10 > > >I don't have a copy of IEEE 268. However, as far as I can tell, it provides >implementation guidance. It's an 80-page document. I believe the latest >issue is dated 1992. > >IEEE/ASTM SI 10-1997, on the other hand, defines SI units, conversion from >traditional units, and style. It's 66 pages. > >Someone else may be able to give you a more definitive answer. > >Bill Potts, CMS >Roseville, CA >http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] >.. > > > > -----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >Behalf Of >Matthew Zotter >Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 03:03 >To: U.S. Metric Association >Subject: [USMA:24914] IEEE 268 vs. IEEE/ASTM SI 10 > > >2003 FEB 21 FRI > >How does IEEE 268 differ from IEEE/ASTM SI 10? >When does IEEE/ASTM SI 10 come up with their next revision. >Thank you for your time. > >Sincerely, >Matthew Zotter >SC, USA >
