|
----- Original Message -----
From: Mustafa
Yilmaz
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:24 PM
Subject: Your comments Dear
Mr. Doore:
1.
Thank you very much for your feedback.
2. It
is true that it seems like there are inconsistencies in our literature and
documentation. Since Paroscientific is involved in 9 different market
segments and each of these market segments uses different pressure units for
applications, we tend to use the pressure units for each application area
depending on which application area a product is used. For example in the
oil exploration market, people are used to talking in MPa. In metrology,
users like using kPa or Pa. In Meteorology, people use hPa or in
Hg.
3. In
addition to this, internationally people like using SI units. So, this
creates confusion and inconsitencies. We will pay more attention to this detail
in our future literature.
Thank
you for your recommendation.
Mustafa Yilmaz Please visit http://www.paroscientific.com/e-letter.asp to sign up for Digiquartz E-Newsletter -----Original Message-----
From: Mark Lawson Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:23 PM To: Mustafa Yilmaz Subject: FW: Data posted to form 1 of http://www.paroscientific.com/mail.htm FYI
Mark
Name: G Stanley Doore MessageI noted in a GPS World issue that you used microbar & hPa in talking about meteorological systems. I also note that you use MPa in describing one of your new instruments. I suggest that you use SI practice as a standard throughout your catalog and instrumentation and use use pressures in 1000s to be consistent. The MCPS is trying to teach the SI and the relationship of units in the Montgomery County School System. It would be very helpful to include the SI throughout even as parentethically. As for meteorological instruments, use kPa rather than hPa to facilitate comparison with other appliicatons. Regards, Stan Doore
|
Title: Results from Form 1 of Page mail.htm
