A little high school lesson regarding Han's points:
I'm rather uncomfortable with the obfuscation and lax use of the
terms "weight" and "mass."
A "pound" is not a unit of mass, it is a unit of weight, which is a
specific form of force. In fact, force is mass multiplied by
acceleration and in the case of a pound it would be 1 slug x 32 ft/s2.
The equivalent metric unit is the Newton, where one Newton equals one
kilogram accelerated at 9.8 meters per second squared.
Without such basic concepts, nomenclature is pointless.
- [USMA:25227] Planck as proposed is ifp in disguise Han Maenen
- [USMA:25239] Re: weights and masses Robert T. Wyatt
- [USMA:25239] Re: weights and masses Joseph B. Reid
- [USMA:25386] Re: weights and masses Robert T. Wyatt
- [USMA:25387] Re: weights and masses Joseph B. Reid
- [USMA:25254] Re: weights and masses Gene Mechtly
- [USMA:25237] Re: Planck as proposed is ifp in disguis... kilopascal
